Frequently Asked Questions

While no Honor Committee member can give case-specific advice on whether something will be considered an Honor Offense by the jury, we encourage reporters to look at the definitions below and make their own determinations on what may constitute an Honor offense. The Honor Committee ByLaws define each Act as:

“Lying” shall mean the misrepresentation of one or more facts in order to gain a benefit or harm another person, where the actor knows or should know that the misrepresentation will be relied upon by another person.

“Cheating” shall mean a violation of any standards, conditions, or rules for which a student may receive benefit, credit, or acknowledgment, academic or otherwise. Cheating includes, but is not limited to, performance of any of the following acts, or abetting a fellow student in the performance of any of the following acts: using unauthorized materials in the completion of work, copying from a fellow student, plagiarism, multiple submission, false citation, false data submission, and/or unauthorized acquisition of advance knowledge of the contents of an exam or assignment.

“Stealing” shall mean the taking, keeping, or appropriation of the property of another without the owner’s permission or approval. Stealing also includes the planning of or participation in the taking, keeping, or appropriation of the property of another without the owner’s permission or approval. Stealing may include, without limitation, the passing of bad checks, the failure to pay for goods or services received, the failure to pay rent, and other failures to fulfill lawful financial obligations.

An Act of Lying, Cheating, and Stealing must have occurred with knowledge that it was an Honor Offense, and it must be considered a Significant breach of the Community of Trust, in order for it to be considered an Honor Offense. If you have questions or believe that an Honor Offense may have occurred, we encourage you to speak with a confidential advisor (contact via website or stop by the Honor Committee office).

If you believe an Honor Offense may have occurred, you should complete the Report Intake Form.Please be aware that once a case has been reported in the Online Case Processing system, it cannot be rescinded. 

You are strongly encouraged to show your support of the University’s Honor System by using the Honor System for significant acts of lying, cheating, and stealing. The Honor System’s constitution, however, does not require that you report cases for each act that you encounter. The University does not have a non-toleration clause – i.e. a student is not required to report an Honor offense that he or she sees – and this spirit is extended to faculty members. Your school or department policy may have other requirements with regard to the Honor System.

If you are a faculty member, you have the freedom to speak to other faculty members about the incident(s) (as long as you preserve the identity of the student in question), to speak to the student(s) involved, and/or to solely address the incident through the Honor System.

The first thing a reporter should do after suspecting an Honor offense is write detailed, contemporaneous notes of the offense in question with as much information as possible. Please include any useful background or contextual information as well as the steps you took leading up to your decision to report a case. 

No. After you formally report an Honor case against a student, the case will be in the system until it is resolved. This policy was instituted to avoid situations in which the Reporter might be pressured to drop a case against their will.

If you suspect a student has used AI, we highly recommend that you report it as an Honor offense. The Honor Committee has a pool of trained Investigators who know how to comb through assignments and AI-generated content to identify similiarities. In addition, Counsel have argued AI use at Hearing beyond a reasonable doubt, resulting in a finding of guilty. 

Each Honor case is unique, and timeliness can vary based on a student's experiences and participation in the process. On average, the Informed Retraction takes 32 school days to complete, from the date of the report to the meeting of the Panel for Sanction

You will be assigned an Honor Advisor, who will serve as your confidential personal contact and source of information throughout the process. Two Honor Investigators will serve as impartial investigators. If an Informed Retraction is not filed, they will interview you, the investigated student, and any other witnesses who may have information about the case. After the investigation is complete, the case will proceed to an Investigative Panel comprised of three Honor Committee members. If the panel finds, based on all the evidence, that it is more likely than not that an Honor offense has occurred, the case will proceed to an Honor Hearing. If the panel finds that it is not more likely than not that an Honor offense has occurred, then the case will be dropped.

As a reporter, your responsibilities are to participate in the Reporter Interview, which usually takes about an Honor, then testify at the Hearing for an hour or two, if the case proceeds to a Hearing. 

Do not return any documents back to the student. Your Honor Advisor will set up a meeting to collect any evidence that you have along with your contemporaneous notes. In order to most effectively investigate the case, we ask for all original documents relevant to the investigation. If you would like this documentation returned at the end of the proceedings, please let your Advisor know.

If the student asks you about the case after you have reported an honor investigation, you should tell the student that any questions that he or she has related to the investigation should be directed towards their Honor Advisor, or they can contact the Honor Committee directly at [email protected]

No, you are not obligate to inform a student of an Honor report in advance, although you are more than welcome to communicate with them about an alleged Honor offense. We request that you submit all communications with the student regarding the alleged Honor offense when filling out the Report Intake form. In addition, regardless of if you choose to inform the student of your Honor report, an Honor Advisor will notify the student within 48 hours of the report. 

If you believe you have committed an Honor Offense and you are not under suspicion by anyone, we encourage you to file a Conscientious Retraction (CR). The CR will allow you to come clean, make amends, and remain in the Community of Trust. If you are not seeking to file a CR, but have questions about a potential Honor Offense, we also encourage you to speak with a confidential advisor (contact via website or stop by the Honor Committee office). An Advisor will never be able to determine whether a particular act is or is not an Honor Offense, but may be able to offer helpful resources and suggestions for understanding and responding appropriately.

All Members of the University community (including students, faculty, and other community members) are encouraged to come to open Honor Committee meetings, every Sunday at 7pm during the regular session of school on the Fourth Floor of Newcomb. There are multiple opportunities at every Honor Committee meeting for community members to give feedback, ask questions, or voice concerns. You can also look out for our community engagement events where we welcome differing perspectives on the Honor System, or email your school’s representative.

Additionally, the Honor Committee has created a standing committee to serve as a liaison between the faculty and the Honor Committee. The Faculty Advisory Committee channels faculty opinion to the Honor Committee and keeps the faculty informed about the Honor System. The Faculty Advisory Committee meets approximately monthly, and if you have comments or concerns, we encourage you to attend a meeting. Please call the Honor offices (924-7602) for meeting dates.

Under the multi-sanction system, the Honor Committee receives over 70 reports every year, up from 40 cases a year under single-sanction. For a more information about recent cases that have been adjudicated by the Honor Committee, visit the Public Summaries page.

Instead of a purely punitive single-sanction system, our new multi-sancton system prioritizes restoration, rehabilitation, and accountability. Insead of having one sanction, such as expulsion or suspension, as the consequence for committing an Honor offense, multi-sanction offers a wide variety of sanctions that panels of randomly-selected Honor Committee representatives tailor to each student, based on the unique circumstances of their case. 

Maintaining confidentiality for a student going through the Honor System is of paramount concern. Honor support officers and all individuals involved in cases are forbidden, by the Judiciary System Standard of Conduct #11, to discuss Honor cases outside of what is required by their obligations.

At the Investigation Panel stage, three Honor Committee members, who normally sit on at least one Investigation Panel a week, judge whether a case meets the standards to send it on to a hearing. Thus, at this stage, confidentiality does not affect the consistency of judgments.

At the hearing stage, the hearing panel is composed of 12 student panelists – 5 Committee representatives and 7 randomly selected students from the University student body. Because of the confidentiality of case results, these students will not have any prior knowledge of judgments in previous Honor cases. Each panel determines a student’s guilt or innocence on three criteria – act, knowledge, and significance. An act is defined as significant if open toleration of it would harm the community of trust at the University of Virginia. 

No. If a student chooses a closed Honor hearing, the only persons to be admitted to the hearing are the student panel, the Honor Committee members presiding over the case, the Honor support officers involved, the Reporter of the case and the accused student(s). The student may ask to bring guests for moral support and to ensure that the proceedings are fair. The Honor Committee also reserves the right to have up to ten support officers or Committee members observe the proceedings for training purposes. All persons attending closed Honor hearings are bound by the Honor Committee’s rules of confidentiality. Students violating said rules may be subject to Judiciary charges under standard #11.

Accused students may elect to hold an open Honor Hearing. Open Honor hearings are relatively infrequent, but any student is welcome to attend when they do occur.

All grade penalties related to the suspicion on an Honor offense are under the sole discretion of the course instructor. The Honor Committee will not sanction any-grade penalties, yet may consider such penalties that have already occurred during the sanctioning process. 

Faculty faith and support is crucial to the longevity of the Honor System. As long-term community members, faculty have a substantial role in shaping students’ attitudes towards the Honor System. Faculty members also enjoy many benefits of living in a community of trust. When you put Honor information of your syllabus or discuss your Honor policies in class, you are showing that the Honor System is alive in the classroom. When you trust students’ excuses, leave the room during a test, or give a take-home exam, you are enjoying some of the benefits of the Honor System. Faculty members also participate in the Honor System by reporting Honor cases when they see a violation of the Honor code.

Put your Honor policy and AI policy on your syllabus. Even if you do not have a strict AI policy in class, we suggest including language such as "if you plan to use the tool for any coursework (grade or ungraded), ask your instructor in advance how the tool can or should be utilized". Discuss your position on Honor and AI in first days of class and throughout the year. Be explicit about what “Pledged” means to you on each assignment. Eliminating ambiguity goes a long way towards ensuring honorable student behavior.

Research regarding college cheating reveals that, when a student believes a faculty member is supportive of the school’s Honor system or academic integrity policy, that student is much more likely to take the policy seriously. If students feel trusted, they will rise to that trust. Trust students, and let them know why you are trusting them.

• Give take-home exams.
• Give unproctored exams.
• Believe a student when they request accommodation unless you have some reason to believe otherwise.
• Encourage students to write and sign the pledge on all graded assignments.

Faculty may, but are not required to, communicate with an accused student’s attorney about an Honor case. There is generally no reason not to be reasonably cooperative, depending on what is being asked, but this is always a matter of judgment and circumstance. Before discussing a case with legal counsel, there should be clear documentation that the attorney is in fact who he or she says, and has in fact been retained by the student in question. Faculty may and should feel comfortable in referring legal counsel to the Office of General Counsel (924-3586), especially if questioning becomes argumentative or intimidating, appears to be suggesting answers, or presents any other reason for causing uneasiness. The General Counsel’s Office will be glad to intervene and provide available information requested. The Honor Committee processes also provide accused students and their advisors with opportunity to understand the factual basis of the charge.

While it necessarily depends on the circumstances, experience over the years has shown that University faculty who discharge their responsibilities in good faith, and without malice, will be afforded legal representation through the Office of General Counsel. Faculty members are also free to retain personal counsel of their choosing at their own personal expense.